XIRR vs CAGR: which return number is telling you the truth?
CAGR and XIRR answer different questions, and using the wrong one can overstate a SIP return by several percentage points. The formulas, a worked example, and when each applies.
3 min read
Lens · 3 June 2026
Holding five funds does not mean holding five portfolios. How to compute overlap between funds, what counts as high, and why diversification by fund count is a poor proxy for diversification.
3 min read
A portfolio of six equity funds sounds diversified. If four of them are large-cap funds benchmarked to the same index, it may hold barely more distinct companies than a single one of them – with the same top holdings, in similar weights, moving together.
Overlap between two funds is the proportion of portfolio weight invested in the same securities. The standard construction takes, for every stock held by either fund, the smaller of the two weights, and sums those minimums.
Overlap(A, B) = Σ min(wᵢᴬ, wᵢᴮ) over all securities iWorked example: two funds, five holdings
| Holding | Weight in Fund A | Weight in Fund B | min() |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock 1 | 9% | 8% | 8% |
| Stock 2 | 7% | 7% | 7% |
| Stock 3 | 6% | 0% | 0% |
| Stock 4 | 5% | 6% | 5% |
| Stock 5 | 0% | 5% | 0% |
| Remaining holdings | 73% | 74% | 22% |
| Overlap | 42% |
Forty-two percent of these two portfolios is the same money in the same companies. Holding both gives you roughly 1.6 portfolios, not 2 – and in a drawdown, the overlapping 42% falls together regardless of how different the fund names are.
There is no regulatory threshold and no single correct number, because it depends entirely on why you hold both funds. What can be said is what different levels imply.
| Overlap | What it implies |
|---|---|
| Below 20% | Genuinely different portfolios. Usually different market caps, sectors or geographies. |
| 20–50% | Meaningful shared exposure. Defensible if the funds differ in strategy or mandate. |
| Above 50% | Largely the same bet twice. Worth asking what the second fund adds beyond a second expense ratio. |
| Above 75% | Near-duplicates. Common among large-cap funds tracking the same benchmark. |
Investors are regularly surprised by step four. A single large-cap name appearing in the top ten of five different funds can end up as several percent of total net worth without ever having been a deliberate decision.
Related product
VriddhiX Lens
Analyse stocks, portfolios and investment data.
Keep reading
CAGR and XIRR answer different questions, and using the wrong one can overstate a SIP return by several percentage points. The formulas, a worked example, and when each applies.
3 min read
Most screens return either four companies or four hundred. How to choose criteria that narrow a universe without accidentally encoding a single sector, and how to sanity-check a screen before trusting it.
3 min read